Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

By A Mystery Man Writer
Last updated 24 Sept 2024
Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis  after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.
Efficacy and Safety of ProGlide Versus Prostar XL Vascular Closure
Comparison of a Single Versus Double Perclose Technique for
Volume 18 Number 10
/storage/issues/98th
Estrategias de Hemostasia del Sitio de Acceso Vascular en el TAVI - CACI
A new Percutaneous technique for effective vascular Access Site closure in patients undergoing Transfemoral aortic valve implantation and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm rEpair: the PASTE study
Algorithm of access-site femoral arterial closure in percutaneous
Safety and Effectiveness of a Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique for Large-Bore Access Closure after Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair - ScienceDirect
Procedural and in-hospital outcomes stratified by Perclose±Angio-Seal.
Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after
Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide
Procedural and in-hospital outcomes stratified by Perclose±Angio-Seal.
Current Access and Closure Options for TAVR Patients
Clinical experience with a novel large bore vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

© 2014-2024 thehygienecleaningcompany.com.au. Inc. or its affiliates.