Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B)

Download scientific diagram | Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B) expanded forms (RISE-L Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA). from publication: Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study | Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable interbody spacers to static interbody spacers. Methods This is a retrospective, institutional review board–exempt chart review of | Static, Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) and Outcome Assessment (Health Care) | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes - North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)

Surgical techniques (Chapter 8) - Anesthesia for Spine Surgery

Static interbody spacer (TransContinental, Globus Medical, Inc

A and B) Immediate postoperative AP and lateral images of the above

Show the model of BAN Figure 3 shows the scenario of normal nodes with

FlareHawk9 – Accelus

Yan Michael LI, MD PhD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, MD Anderson

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Charles LEDONIO, Senior Director, Exactech, Inc., Florida, Clinical Affairs

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes - North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)